As a student
and, for many years throughout my career, as a teacher, I have conscientiously
delved into the theory of practically anything related to the acquisition and
teaching of English as a foreign language.
My theoretical
grounding has stood me in good stead all those years though not without the
support of solid hands-on experience. After all one has to make a start and
therefore needs a framework within which to act. At least this was my default
setting.
Theoretical
books as well as methodological ones are fine as far as they go. There are
different proponents of different theories about how learning a foreign
language takes place and if you are a novice and haven’t got the foggiest idea
where to start you have no other choice but to take one on trust, which is what
we also do in real life.
I have moved on
from grammar and translation through
audiolingual, communicative, functional methods to multiple
intelligences to what is now my own re-adaptable approach, a crystallization of
all the input fortified with my own discoveries and ideas of learning. Far from
suggesting that I have learnt everything, I propose here that we learn as long
as we teach if only because the means available are different and our
experience is being enriched all the time even if adding up the minutiae and being
led to generalizations is painfully slow. I like to think that teachers’
generalisations are fed back into new theories of how we learn as everything is
in a fluid state of being defined and redefined.
In order to
learn from your learners you have to hold your feelers out all the time. You
have to observe how students approach and process new input, what mistakes they
make, how much mother tongue interference accounts for their mistakes, how much
their imagination and eagerness gets the better of accuracy, or, by the same
token, to what extent their lack of motivation or lack of ability or dearth of
pragmatic knowledge limits their efficiency in foreign language learning.
Watching
learners, both young ones and adults, taking in and processing information is
an absolutely amazing experience and can only be effective if the teacher is
genuinely interested in their students as people as so much depends on that.
Personally I am fortunate enough to teach people from a very young age and see
them through to completing a full course up to levels B2, C1 and C2. This
allows me some continuity both in terms of biological growth and mental
development.
Personality and
ability have an intriguing way of interacting when learning – not just a
language, I suppose – since personality determines whether a learner will
persevere or give up or whether the learner will turn an impediment to good advantage by becoming more
resourceful and more determined to overcome obstacles.
By way of
illustration, I will provide an example of a young dyslexic learner in one of
my classes. The child is eight years old and apparently aware of her difficulty
in reading. A couple of weeks into her first year, she has already developed
some strategies to get round the problem. She listens intently to me and the
audio aids used in class without looking in the book so that she can learn the
new lesson by heart. (I normally make a point of exposing learners to the
sounds of new words first and then to their written form.) She whispers
sentences while someone else is reading and when the class focuses on some
written exercises and she gets stuck at a word that she can’t decipher, she
will always ask me to tell her what the word is so that she can continue with
the exercise. In other words, the child is making every effort to learn and she
shows a will and inventiveness that one might be surprised to find in a child
of her age, which is admirable. Class dynamics is also very important. In the
case of the girl, what further motivates her is an underlying competition with
a friend of hers.
All in all,
every learner has a story to tell which perhaps is part of their life story.