It is a common belief that young people are best
suited to question set ideas, to challenge the status quo, to long for the
revolution that will bring everything down and build the world from scratch. Maybe
so.
However, I feel that no revolution can compare to the
informed one, the revolution of those who know where they come from and what it
is they are rebelling against.
Do I feel rebellious? I certainly do.
As a teacher of a few decades, having spent long hours
with children of 7 to 17, I feel that almost all the exams for obtaining language qualifications do injustice to the
different talents and abilities of students.
Think, for example, of all the research into language
acquisition, of all the different methods which will allow people of different
intelligences to approach a foreign language in a way that will help them
assimilate structures and words. On the other hand, think of all the exam
materials available for preparing successful candidates.
Now try to figure how much fun and how much real
learning exam requirements enable. Am I the only one to think that nobody will
be asked to write a film review in real life unless they pursue a career as film critics?
Am I the only one to think that completing two writing
tasks of about 300 words each in 1 ½ hours is pointless and does not really
allow the candidate to focus on either. Nor does it give the examiner a better
understanding of the candidate’s proficiency in the language than just one
would.
Am I alone in getting frustrated when two totally
mismatched candidates try to interact in a speaking test and only succeed in
ruining each other’s chances? What is the point in interaction if one has not
made sure that the two candidates fulfil some basic requirements? And what is
wrong with individuals examined separately?
When I work with dyslexic people and try to catch up
with them trying out so many different answers in their heads—sometimes aloud
too-- so they can get to the right one, I am at a loss. I couldn’t process half
of this information so fast. Is some extra time thrown to them for
accomplishing the tasks going to even give the examiner an inkling of the
effort and the thinking process at work?
Please do not ask me what is to be done and should we
do away with exams. I only know this one thing; I have reached this point in my
teaching career where I feel an irresistible urge to rebel, to join ranks with
my students.
No comments:
Post a Comment